#Jurisdiction as element of crime trial

Navaja is charged with the crime of falsification of private document before the Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC) of Jagna-Garcia-Hernandez, Bohol, docketed as Criminal Case No. Navaja, alleging that while she was still its Regional Sales Manager, she falsified a receipt by making it appear that she incurred meal expenses in the amount of ₱1,810.00, instead of the actual amount of ₱810.00, at Garden Cafe, Jagna, Bohol, and claimed reimbursement for it. Edgar Borje, against petitioner Ana Lou B.

The instant case arose from a Complaint-Affidavit 3 filed by private respondent DKT Philippines, Inc., represented by Atty. 02353, which affirmed the Order dated Septemissued by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Loay, Bohol, Branch 50, in SP Civil Action No. This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, assailing the Decision 1 dated Augand the Resolution 2 dated rendered by the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-GR. DE CASTRO, or the Acting Presiding Judge of MCTC Jagna-Garcia-Hernandez, DKT PHILS., INC., represented by ATTY. For a state court to hear this case, that court will typically need to satisfy the constitutional due process requirement for territorial jurisdiction (see above) as well as the state statutory requirement, which is typically known as a state's long-arm statute.HON. Parties will often sue a defendant who is a resident of a different state.

An example showing the interplay of diversity jurisdiction with subject-matter jurisdiction is Grupo Dataflux v. Other forms of jurisdiction include appellate jurisdiction (the power of one court to correct the errors of another, lower court), concurrent jurisdiction (the notion that two courts might share the power to hear cases of the same type, arising in the same place), and diversity jurisdiction (the power of Federal courts to hear cases in which the parties are from different states). State court territorial jurisdiction is determined by the Due Process Clause of the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment and the federal court territorial jurisdiction is determined by the Due Process Clause of the Constitution's Fifth Amendment. This law determines the scope of federal and state court power. Territorial jurisdiction is the court's power to bind the parties to the action.

Federal courts have limited jurisdiction in that they can only hear cases that fall both within the scope defined by the Constitution in Article III Section 2 and Congressional statutes (See 28 U.S.C. State courts have general jurisdiction, meaning that they can hear any controversy except those prohibited by state law (some states, for example, deny subject matter jurisdiction for a case that does not involve state citizens and did not take place in the state) and those allocated to federal courts of exclusive jurisdiction such as bankruptcy issues (see 28 U.S.C. Subject matter jurisdiction is the court's authority to decide the issue in controversy such as a contracts issue, or a civil rights issue. Such a legal question is referred to as 'jurisdiction to determine jurisdiction.' The question of whether a given court has the power to determine a jurisdictional question is itself a jurisdictional question. The term jurisdiction can be best understood by being compared to 'power.' Any court possesses jurisdiction over matters only to the extent granted to it by the Constitution, and/or legislation of the sovereignty on behalf of which it functions (ex: a state court in Mississippi may need statutory permission by the Mississippi legislature to hear certain types of cases). whether there is jurisdiction to render the particular judgment sought.whether there is jurisdiction over the subject matter.

This is further broken down into 3 categories (See Pennoyer v.

whether there is personal jurisdiction.

A jurisdictional question may be broken down into three components: One of the most fundamental questions of law is whether a given court has jurisdiction to preside over a given case.

Territory within which a court or government agency may properly exercise its power.

Power of a court to adjudicate cases and issue orders.